Estudo da capacidade de remoção de 2-MIB e geosmina por membranas de nanofiltração pré-tratadas em água e solução aquosa de etanol 50% (v/v)

Charyane Satie Sato; Mariana Perazzoli Schmoeller; Lucila Adriani de Almeida Coral; Fátima de Jesus Bassetti

doi:10.5327/Z2176-94781306

Autores

Charyane Satie Sato Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (UTFPR) - Brasil https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2460-2554
Mariana Perazzoli Schmoeller Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (UTFPR) - Brasil https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9776-8635
Lucila Adriani de Almeida Coral Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (UTFPR) - Brasil https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1041-5878
Fátima de Jesus Bassetti Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (UTFPR) - Brasil https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6697-6503

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5327/Z2176-94781306

Palavras-chave:

metabólitos secundários; membranas de nanofiltração; etanol.

Resumo

Membranas de nanofiltração apresentam elevada eficácia na remoção de compostos de baixa massa molar, o que inclui os metabólitos secundários 2-metilisoborneol (2-MIB) e 1,10-dimetil trans-9-decalol (Geosmina), produzidos por cianobactérias e de difícil remoção por processos convencionais de tratamento. Considerando-se que elevada retenção e fluxo permeado são características importantes no processo, este estudo teve por objetivo avaliar a eficiência da membrana NF90 pré-tratada com água e solução de etanol 50% (v/v) na retenção de 2-MIB e Geosmina, considerando-se a aplicação de baixas pressões constantes de trabalho 4, 7 e 10 bar, avaliando-se a sua permeabilidade à água e capacidade de retenção dos metabólitos. A retenção foi avaliada com a concentração de 100 ng L-1 de 2-MIB e Geosmina por 120 minutos de tempo de filtração. A ocorrência de fouling foi igualmente avaliada constatando-se não haver incrustação. Nas três pressões empregadas, membranas pré-tratadas em solução de etanol 50% (v/v) apresentaram um fluxo permeado superior (91,4 L m-2 h-1 a 225,4 L m-2 h-1) ao observado para membranas tratadas em água (34,08 L m-2 h-1 a 59,14 L m-2 h-1). Quanto à retenção, não foram observadas diferenças expressivas entre as membranas, tendo-se obtido remoções de 93 e 99% para membranas pré-tratadas em solução de etanol 50% (v/v) e água, respectivamente. Pode-se observar que o pré-tratamento conservou a eficiência na retenção de compostos e propiciou a melhoria das características físicas e químicas da membrana, permitindo a obtenção de fluxos permeados maiores do que o observado com a membrana pré-tratada em água.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Referências

Almeida, L.C.; Fernandes Jorge, T.B.; Pinto, R.; Canevari G.C., 2015. Cyanobacteria and cyanotoxins risk factors for water supply (Cianobactérias e cianotoxinas fatores de risco para o abastecimento de água). Revista Científica Univiçosa (Online), v. 7, (1), 508-513.

Artuğ, G.; Roosmasari, I.; Richau, K.; Hapke, J., 2007. A comprehensive characterization of commercial nanofiltration membranes. Separation Science and Technology (Online), v. 42, (13), 2947-2986. https://doi.org/10.1080/01496390701560082.

Bortoli, S.; Pinto, E., 2015. Cyanotoxins: general characteristics, history, legislation and analysis methods. In: Pompêo et al. (Eds.). Ecology of reservoirs and interfaces (Cianotoxinas: características gerais, histórico, legislação e métodos de análises. São Paulo: Instituto de Biociências da Universidade de São Paulo, p. 319-339.

Boussu, K.; Zhang, Y.; Cocquyt, J.; Van Der Meeren, P.; Volodin, A.; Van Haesendonck, C.; Martens, J.A.; Van Der Bruggen, B., 2006. Characterization of polymeric nanofiltration membranes for systematic analysis of membrane performance. Journal of Membrane Science (Online), v. 278, (1-2), 418-427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2005.11.027.

Chung, Y.; Lee, M.-Y.; Park, H.; Park, Y.-I.; Nam, S.-E.; Lee, P.B.; Hwang, Y.-S.; Kang, S., 2018. Novel preparation of ceramic nanofiltration membrane for the removal of trace organic compounds. Desalination and Water Treatment (Online), v. 101, 31-36. https://doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2018.21642.

Cortada, C.; Vidal, L.; Canals, A., 2011. Determination of geosmin and 2-methylisoborneol in water and wine samples by ultrasound-assisted dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction coupled to gas chromatography–mass spectrometry. Journal of Chromatography A, v. 1218, (1), 17-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2010.11.007.

Diaz, A.S., 2008. Application of nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membrane technology for the treatment of aqueous solutions of phenolic compounds and carboxylic acids. (Aplicación de la tecnología de membranas de nanofiltración y ósmosis inversa para el tratamiento de disoluciones acuosas de compuestos fenólicos y ácidos carboxílicos). 2008. 258f. Thesis (Doctorate in Chemical and Environmental Technology) – Departamento de Tecnologia Química e Ambiental, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Madrid.

Diel, J.L., 2010. Functional characterization of ceramic micro- and ultrafiltration membranes. (Caracterização Funcional de Membranas Cerâmicas de Micro e Ultrafiltração). 2010. 131f. Dissertation (Masters in Engineering) – Graduate Program in Chemical Engineering, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre.

Dixon, M.B.; Falconet, C.; Ho, L.; Chow, C.W.K.; O’neill, B.K.; Newcombe, G., 2011. Removal of cyanobacterial metabolites by nanofiltration from two treated waters. Journal of Hazardous Materials (Online), v. 188, (1-3), 288-295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.01.111.

Ebert, K.; Koll, J.; Dijkstra, M.F.J, Eggers, M., 2006. Fundamental studies on the performance of a hydrophobic solvent stable membrane in non-aqueous solutions. Journal of Membrane Science (Online), v. 285, (1-2), 75-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2006.07.037.

Faruqi, A.; Henderson, M.; Henderson, R.K.; Stuetz, R.M.; Gladman, B.; McDowall, B.; Zamyadi, A., 2018. Removal of algal taste and odour compounds by granular and biological activated carbon in full-scale water treatment plants. Water Science & Technology Supply (Online), v. 18, (5), 1531-1544. https://doi.org/10.2166/ws.2018.001.

Geens, J.; Peeters, K.; Van Der Bruggen, B.; Vandecasteele C., 2005. Polymeric nanofiltration of binary water–alcohol mixtures: Influence of feed composition and membrane properties on permeability and rejection. Journal of Membrane Science (Online), v. 255, (1-2), 255-264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2005.01.039.

Geens, J.; Van Der Bruggen, B.; Vandecasteele, C., 2004. Characterisation of the solvent stability of polymeric nanofiltration membranes by measurement of contact angles and swelling. Chemical Engineering Science (Online), v. 59, (5), 1161-1164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2004.01.003.

Geens, J.; Van der Bruggen, B.; Vandecasteele, C., 2006. Transport model for solvent permeation through nanofiltration membrane. Separation and Purification Technology (Online), v. 48, (3), 255-263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2005.07.032.

Glibert, P.M., 2017. Eutrophication, harmful algae and biodiversity — challenging paradigms in a world of complex nutrient changes. Marine Pollution Bulletin, v. 124, (2), 591-606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.04.027.

Heffernan, R.; Semião, A.J.C.; Desmond, P.; Cao, H.; Safari, A.; Habimana, O., Casey, E., 2013. Disinfection of a polyamide nanofiltration membrane using ethanol. Journal of Membrane Science (Online), v. 448, 170-179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2013.07.069.

Herrero, A.; Flores, E., 2008. The cyanobacteria Molecular Biology, Genetics and Evolution. Norfold: The cyanobacteria Molecular Biology, Genetics and Evolution, (1).

Hsieh, W.-H.; Hung, W.-N.; Wang, G.-S., Hsieh, S.-T.; Lin, T.-F., 2012. Effect of pH on the analysis of 2-MIB and geosmin in water. Water Air and Soil Pollution (Online), v. 223, 715-721. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-011-0896-4.

Khorshidi, B.; Thundat, T.; Fleck, B.A.; Sadrzadeh, M. 2016. A novel approach toward fabrication of high performance thin film composite polyamide membranes behnam. Scientific Reports (Online), v. 6, (1), 22069. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep22069.

Kirsh, Y.E.; Fedotov, Y.A.; Semenova, S.I.; Vdovin, P.A.; Valuev, V.V.; Zemlianova, O.Y.; Timashev, S.F., 1995. Sulfonate containing aromatic polyamides as materials of pervaporation membranes for dehydration of organic solvents: hydration, sorption, diffusion and functioning. Journal of Membrane Science (Online), v. 103, (1-2), 95-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/0376-7388(94)00312-M.

Kwon, Y.; Shih, K.; Tang, C.; Leckie, J.O., 2012. Adsorption of perfluorinated compounds on thin-film composite polyamide membranes. Journal of Applied Polymer Science (Online), v. 124, (2), 1042-1049. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.35182.

Li, H.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, J.; Dong, B., 2020. Pilot study on nanofiltration membrane in advanced treatment of drinking water. Water Supply, v. 20, (6), 2043-2053. https://doi.org/10.2166/ws.2020.089.

Li, Y.; Wong, E.; Mai, Z.; Van der Bruggen, B., 2019. Fabrication of composite polyamide/Kevlar aramid nanofiber nanofiltration membranes with high permselectivity in water desalination. Journal of Membrane Science (Online), v. 592, 117396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2019.117396.

Louie, J.S.; Pinnau, I.; Reinhard, M., 2011. Effects of surface coating process conditions on the water permeation and salt rejection properties of composite polyamide reverse osmosis membranes. Journal of Membrane Science (Online), v. 367, (1-2), 249-255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2010.10.067.

Martínez, M.B.; Van Der Bruggen, B.; Negrin, Z.R.; Alconero, P.L. 2012. Separation of a high-value pharmaceutical compound from waste ethanol by nanofiltration. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry (Online), v. 18, (5), 1635-1641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2012.02.024.

Matsui, Y.; Nakao, S.; Taniguchi, T.; Matsushita, T., 2013. Geosmin and 2-methylisoborneol removal using superfine powdered activated carbon: Shell adsorption and branched-pore kinetic model analysis and optimal particle size. Water Research (Online), v. 47, (8), 2873-2880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2013.02.046.

Mody, A.J. 2004. Feasibility of using nanofiltration as a polishing process for removal of cyanobacterial exudates from treated surface water. Thesis (PhD in Science in Environmental Engineering) – College of Engineering, University of South Florida, Florida.

Mustapha, S.; Tijani, J.O.; Ndamitso, M.; Abdulkareem, A. S; Shuaib, D.T; Mohammed, A. K., 2021. A critical review on geosmin and 2 methylisoborneol in water: sources, effects, detection, and removal techniques. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment (Online), v. 193, (4), 204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-021-08980-9.

Nunes, S.P.; Peinemann, K.V. 2006. Membrane technology in the chemical industry. 2. ed. Wiley, Weinheim, 592 pp. https://doi.org/10.1002/3527600388.ch4.

Plakas, K.V.; Karabelas, A.J., 2008. Membrane retention of herbicides from single and multi-solute media: The effect of ionic environment. Journal of Membrane Science (Online), v. 320, (1-2), 325-334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2008.04.016.

Reiss, C.R.; Robert, C.; Owen, C.; Taylor, J.S., 2006. Control of MIB, geosmin and TON by membrane systems. Journal of Water Supply: Research and Technology - AQUA (Online), v. 55, (2), 95-108. https://doi.org/10.2166/aqua.2006.071.

Sauvé, S.; Desrosiers, M., 2014. A review of what is an emerging contaminant. Chemistry Central Journal (Online), v. 8, (1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1186/1752-153X-8-15.

Silva, P.; Han, S.; Livingston, A.G., 2005. Solvent transport in organic solvent nanofiltration membranes. Journal of Membrane Science (Online), v. 262, (1-2), 49-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2005.03.052.

Souza, S.M.G.; Mathies, V.D.; Fioravanzo, R.F. 2012. Off-flavor by geosmin and 2-Methylisoborneol in aquaculture (Off-flavor por geosmina e 2-Metilisoborneol na aquicultura). Semina: Agricultural Sciences, v. 33, (2), 835-846. https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2012v33n2p835.

Srinivasan, R.; Sorial, G.A., 2011. Treatment of taste and odor causing compounds 2-methyl Isoborneol and geosmin in drinking water: A critical review. Journal of Environmental Sciences (Online), 23, (1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-0742(10)60367-1.

Teixeira, M.R.; Rosa, M.J.; Nyström, M., 2005. The role of membrane charge on nanofiltration performance. J. Membrane Science (Online), v. 265, (1-2), 160-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2005.04.046.

Tsibranska, I.H.; Tylkowski, B., 2013. Concentration of ethanolic extracts from Sideritis ssp. L. by nanofiltration: Comparison of dead-end and cross-flow modes. Food and Bioproducts Processing (Online), v. 91, (2), 169-174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbp.2012.09.004.

Van Der Bruggen, B.; Geens; J.; Vandecasteele, C., 2002. Fluxes and rejections for nanofiltration with solvent stable polymeric membranes in water, ethanol and n-hexane. Chemical Engineering Science (Online), v. 57, (13), 2511-2518. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2509(02)00125-2.

Vankelecom, I.F.J; Smet, K.D.; Gevers, L.E.M; Jacobs, P.A., 2005. Nanofiltration membrane materials and preparation. In: Schäfer, A.I.; Fane, A.G.; Waite, T.D. (eds.). Nanofiltration: Principles and Applications. Oxford: Elsevier, p. 33.

Xu, P.; Drewes, J.E.; Kim, T-U.; Bellona, C.; Amy G., 2006. Effect of membrane fouling on transport of organic contaminants in NF/RO membrane applications. Journal of Membrane Science (Online), v. 279, (1-2), 165-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2005.12.001.

You, Y.-W. 2012. Sensitive Detection of 2-MIB and Geosmin in Drinking Water. California: Agilent Technologies.

Yu, Y.-B.; Choi, Y.-H.; Kim, D.J.; Kwon, S.-B.; Kim, C.-H., 2014. Rejection property of geosmin and 2-Methylisoborneol (MIB) with high concentration level at multi stage nanofiltration (NF) membrane system. Journal of Korean Society of Water and Wastewater (Online), v. 28, (4), 397-409. https://doi.org/10.11001/jksww.2014.28.4.397.

Zamyadi, A.; Henderson, R.; Stuetz, R.M.; Hofmann, R.; Ho, L; Newcombe, G. 2015. Fate of geosmin and 2- methylisoborneol in full-scale water treatment plants. Water Research, v. 83, 171-183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2015.06.038.

Zat, M.; Benetti, A.D., 2011. Removal of the odoriferous compounds geosmin and 2-methylisoborneol from drinking water by the processes of cascade aeration, air stripping and nanofiltration. Engenharia Sanitária e Ambiental (Online), v. 16, (4), 353-360. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-41522011000400006.

Zhang, R.; Su, S.; Gao, S.; Tian J., 2021. Reconstruction of the polyamide film in nanofiltration membranes via the post-treatment with a ternary mixture of ethanol-water-NaOH: Mechanism and effect. Desalination (Online), v. 519, 115317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2021.115317.

Zhao, Y.; Yuan, Q., 2006a. A comparison of nanofiltration with aqueous and organic solvents. Journal of Membrane Science (Online), v. 279, (1-2), 453-458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2005.12.040.

Zhao, Y.; Yuan, Q., 2006b. Effect of membrane pretreatment on performance of solvent resistant nanofiltration membranes in methanol solutions. Journal of Membrane Science (Online), v. 280, (1-2), 195-201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2006.01.026.