Comparative life cycle assessment in wastewater treatment plants: scenario analysis with OpenLCA

Bruno de Medeiros Souza; Rui de Oliveira; Ruth Silveira do Nascimento; Katharine Taveira de Brito Medeiros

doi:10.5327/Z2176-94782330

Authors

Bruno de Medeiros Souza Universidade Estadual da Paraíba (UEPB) - Brazil https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6671-3618
Rui de Oliveira Universidade Estadual da Paraíba (UEPB) - Brazil https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1972-9809
Ruth Silveira do Nascimento Universidade Estadual da Paraíba (UEPB) - Brazil https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1342-3075
Katharine Taveira de Brito Medeiros Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia da Paraíba (IFPB) - Brazil https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3685-8709

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5327/Z2176-94782330

Keywords:

sustainability; OpenLCA; environmental viability; environmental impact.

Abstract

Although they play a crucial environmental role, wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) also generate environmental impacts due to resource consumption and waste production. Therefore, the application of the life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology is of fundamental importance for a comprehensive analysis of the impacts associated with these systems. This work aims to perform an LCA of a tertiary-level WWTP, consisting of an anaerobic reactor followed by activated sludge, in order to select the most sustainable scenario. Open Source Life Cycle Assessment (OpenLCA) was the software used, along with the Ecoinvent, BIOENERGIEDAT_18, ELCD, and NEEDS databases. The reference methods for calculating impact categories were CML-IA and ReCiPe. Three scenarios were simulated: CT_Base, CT_Solar, and CT_Reuse. All models considered the operation and maintenance (O&M) phase. The CT_Base scenario assumed the WWTP operates as it currently does (electricity from hydropower), the CT_Solar scenario operated entirely on solar energy, and the CT_Reuse scenario established the reusing of 25% of the treated effluent. The functional unit (FU) adopted corresponded to the volume of wastewater treated over 15 years of O&M of the WWTP. For both methods applied, the CT_Solar scenario was the most environmentally advantageous. The amount of gases emitted in the CT_Reuse scenario during the transportation of treated effluent to reuse points increased negative impacts and consequently environmental degradation across various categories, making it the least sustainable scenario.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alizadeh, S.; Zafari-Koloukhi, H.; Rostami, F.; Rouhbakhsh, M.; Avami, A., 2020. The eco-efficiency assessment of wastewater treatment plants in the city of Mashhad using emergy and life cycle analyses. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 249, 119327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119327

Al-Anbari, M.A.; Altaee, S.A.; Kareem, S.L., 2022. Using life cycle assessment (LCA) in appraisal sustainability indicators of Najaf wastewater treatment plant. Egyptian Journal of Chemistry, v. 65 (9), 513-519. https://doi.org/10.21608/EJCHEM.2022.113093.5139

Araújo, M.C.; Medeiros, D.L.; Cohim, E., 2022. Desempenho energético e pegada de carbono de um sistema de esgotamento sanitário centralizado no Nordeste brasileiro. Engenharia Sanitária e Ambiental, v. 27 (1), 205-221. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-415220200325

Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas (ABNT). 2009a. NBR ISO 14040: Gestão ambiental – avaliação do ciclo de vida – princípios e estrutura. ABNT, Rio de Janeiro.

Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas (ABNT). 2009b. NBR ISO 14044: Avaliação do ciclo de vida: requisitos e orientações. ABNT, Rio de Janeiro.

Awad, H.; Mossad, M.; Mahanna, H.; Foad, M.; El-Badawy, A.; Alalm, M.G., 2024. Performance and life cycle assessment of moving-bed biofilm and integrated fixed-film reactors to upgrade activated sludge systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 449, 141624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141624

Batool, M.; Shahzad, L.; Tahir, A., 2023. Review on municipal wastewater to energy generation; a favorable approach for developing countries. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Energy.

Boldrin, M.T.N.; Formiga, K.T.M.; Pacca, S.A., 2022. Environmental performance of an integrated water supply and wastewater system through life cycle assessment—A Brazilian case study. Science of The Total Environment, v. 835, 155213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155213

Brasil, 2020. Lei Federal 14.026, de 15 de julho de 2020. Diário Oficial da República do Brasil.

Daskiran, F.; Gulhan, H.; Guven, H.; Ozgun, H.; Ersahin, M.E., 2022. Comparative evaluation of different operation scenarios for a full-scale wastewater treatment plant: Modeling coupled with life cycle assessment. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 341, 130864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130864

De Carvalho, C.H.R., 2011. Emissões relativas de poluentes do transporte motorizado de passageiros nos grandes centros urbanos brasileiros, Texto para Discussão, No. 1606. Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada (IPEA), Brasília.

Departamento de Trânsito do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (Detran); Fundação Estadual de Engenharia e Meio Ambiente (Feema), 2001. Poluição veicular no estado do Rio de Janeiro. Detran, Feema, Rio de Janeiro.

Dufner, L.; Selvam, T.S.S.; Otto, N.; Neuffer, D.; Santos, H.R.D., 2022. Performance evaluation of a solar-powered wastewater treatment plant (two-stage SBR) operated in tropical climate regions. Engenharia Sanitária e Ambiental, v. 27 (6), 1123-1132. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-415220210261

Gallego-Schmid, A.; Tarpani, R.R.Z., 2019. Life cycle assessment of wastewater treatment in developing countries: a review. Water Research, v. 153, 63-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2019.01.010

Jamaludin, M.; Tsai, Y.C.; Lin, H.T.; Huang, C.Y.; Choi, W.; Chen, J.G.; Sean, W.Y., 2024. Modeling and control strategies for energy management in a wastewater center: a review on aeration. Energies, v. 17 (13), 3162. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17133162

Kalbar, P.P.; Karmakar, S.; Asolekar, S.R., 2013. Assessment of wastewater treatment technologies: life cycle approach. Water and Environment Journal, v. 27 (2), 261-268. https://doi.org/10.1111/wej.12006

Kar, S.; Singh, R.; Gurian, P.L.; Hendricks, A.; Kohl, P.; Mckelvey, S.; Spatari, S., 2023. Life cycle assessment and techno-economic analysis of nitrogen recovery by ammonia air-stripping from wastewater treatment. Science of The Total Environment, v. 857 (Part 3), 159499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159499

Karolinczak, B.; Walczak, J.; Bogacka, M.; Zubrowska-Sudol, M., 2024. Life Cycle Assessment of sewage sludge mono-digestion and co-digestion with the organic fraction of municipal solid waste at a wastewater treatment plant. Science of the Total Environment, v. 907, 167801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.167801

Leite, C.H.P.; Moita Neto, J.M.; Bezerra, A.K.L., 2022. Novo marco legal do saneamento básico: alterações e perspectivas. Engenharia Sanitária e Ambiental, v. 27 (5), 1041-1047. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-415220210311

Lima, P.D.M.; Lopes, T.A.D.S.; Queiroz, L.M.; Mcconville, J.R., 2022. Resource-oriented sanitation: Identifying appropriate technologies and environmental gains by coupling Santiago software and life cycle assessment in a Brazilian case study. Science of the Total Environment, v. 837, 155777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155777

Lopes, T.A.D.S.; Kiperstok, A.; Zanta, V.M.; Queiroz, L.M., 2017. Revisão crítica da literatura sobre aplicação da Avaliação de Ciclo de Vida ao tratamento de esgotos. Revista DAE, v. 65 (208), 47-55. https://doi.org/10.4322/dae.2017.005

Maktabifard, M.; Zaborowska, E.; Makinia, J., 2020. Energy neutrality versus carbon footprint minimization in municipal wastewater treatment plants. Bioresource Technology, v. 300, 122647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122647

Mancini, G.; Lombardi, L.; Luciano, A.; Bolzonella, D.; Viotti, P.; Fino, D., 2024. A reduction in global impacts through a waste-wastewater-energy nexus: A life cycle assessment. Energy, v. 289, 130020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2023.130020

Marami, H.; Tsapekos, P.; Khoshnevisan, B.; Madsen, J.A.; Andersen, J.K.; Rafiee, S.; Angelidaki, I., 2022. Going beyond conventional wastewater treatment plants within circular bioeconomy concept–a sustainability assessment study. Water Science and Technology, v. 85 (6), 1878-1903. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2022.096

Parra-Saldivar, R.; Bilal, M.; Iqbal, H.M.N., 2020. Life cycle assessment in wastewater treatment technology. Current Opinion in Environmental Science & Health, v. 13, 80-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coesh.2019.12.003

Pasciucco, F.; Pecorini, I.; Iannelli, R., 2023. A comparative LCA of three WWTPs in a tourist area: Effects of seasonal loading rate variations. Science of The Total Environment, v. 863, 160841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.160841

Patel, K.; Singh, S.K., 2022. A life cycle approach to environmental assessment of wastewater and sludge treatment processes. Water and Environment Journal, v. 36 (3), 412-424. https://doi.org/10.1111/wej.12774

Rashid, S.S.; Harun, S.N.; Hanafiah, M.M.; Razman, K.K.; Liu, Y.Q., Tholibon, D.A., 2023. Life cycle assessment and its application in wastewater treatment: a brief overview. Processes, v. 11 (1), 208. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11010208

Rufí-Salís, M.; Petit-Boix, A.; Leipold, S.; Villalba, G.; Rieradevall, J.; Moliné, E.; Suárez-Ojeda, M.E., 2022. Increasing resource circularity in wastewater treatment: Environmental implications of technological upgrades. Science of the Total Environment, v. 838 (Part 3), 156422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156422

Saavedra-Rubio, K.; Thonemann, N.; Crenna, E.; Lemoine, B.; Caliandro, P.; Laurent, A., 2022. Stepwise guidance for data collection in the life cycle inventory (LCI) phase: Building technology-related LCI blocks. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 366, 132903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132903

Shanmugam, K.; Gadhamshetty, V.; Tysklind, M.; Bhattacharyya, D.; Upadhyayula, V.K.K, 2022. A sustainable performance assessment framework for circular management of municipal wastewater treatment plants. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 339, 130657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130657

Sheikholeslami, Z.; Ehteshami, M.; Nazif, S.; Semiarian, A., 2022. The environmental assessment of tertiary treatment technologies for wastewater reuse by considering LCA uncertainty. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, v. 168, 928-941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2022.10.074

Silva, D.A.L.; Nunes, A.O.; Piekarski, C.M.; Da Silva Moris, V.A.; De Souza, L.S.M.; Rodrigues, T.O., 2019. Why using different Life Cycle Assessment software tools can generate different results for the same product system? A cause–effect analysis of the problem. Sustainable Production and Consumption, v. 20, 304-315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2019.07.005

Sistema Nacional de Informações sobre Saneamento (SNIS), 2022. Diagnóstico anual de águas e esgotos (Accessed January 26, 2023) at:. https://arquivos-snis.mdr.gov.br/REPUBLICACAO_DIAGNOSTICO_TEMATICO_VISAO_GERAL_AE_SNIS_2022.pdf

Souza, B.D.M.; Duarte, M.A.C.; Tinôco, J.D., 2021. Custos de operação e manutenção de estação de tratamento de esgotos por reator anaeróbio e lodos ativados. Engenharia Sanitária e Ambiental, v. 26 (3), 505-515. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-415220190228

Sudarno, S.; Wibowo, M.A.; Andarini, P.; Al Qadar, S., 2024. Assessing the environmental implications of water and wastewater production using life cycle assessment. Ecological Engineering & Environmental Technology, v. 25 (4), 70-80. https://doi.org/10.12912/27197050/183183

Talang, R.P.N.; Sirivithayapakorn, S.; Polruang, S., 2022. Life cycle impact assessment and life cycle cost assessment for centralized and decentralized wastewater treatment plants in Thailand. Scientific Reports, v. 12 (1), 14540. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-18852-y

Tian, X.; Richardson, R.E.; Tester, J.W.; Lozano, J.L.; You, F., 2020. Retrofitting municipal wastewater treatment facilities toward a greener and circular economy by virtue of resource recovery: techno-economic analysis and life cycle assessment. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, v. 8 (36), 13823-13837. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c05189

Torre, A.; Vázquez-Rowe, I.; Parodi, E.; Kahhat, R., 2024. A multi-criteria decision framework for circular wastewater systems in emerging megacities of the Global South. Science of the Total Environment, v. 912, 169085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.169085

Yang, Z.; Ma, S.; Du, S.; Chen, Y.; Li, X.; Wang, R., Tan, Z., 2021. Assessment of upgrading WWTP in southwest China: Towards a cleaner production. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 326, 129381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129381