Biodiversity and forestry: relative abundance of Nothura maculosa in eucalyptus plantations and native grasslands in southern Brazil
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5327/Z2176-94781554Keywords:
green deserts; pampa biome; spotted Nothura; planted forests.Abstract
Over the last decades, agribusiness has shown a great expansion in the Pampa Biome. Forestry, mainly with eucalyptus, has expanded its planting in the Rio Grande do Sul state, southern Brazil. The objective of this study was to contribute to the understanding of the impact of planted forests on Brazilian Pampa biodiversity, through the comparison of the relative abundance of Nothura maculosa in areas of native field and areas with young (aged 6–12 months) eucalyptus. Pointing dogs were used to define the relative abundance (individuals per hour) of N. maculosa on 16 farms and ten eucalyptus plantations. A total of 307 individuals of N. maculosa were recorded on the 26 sampled properties, of which 188 were found in grasslands (average of 12.6 ind.h-1) and 119 in eucalyptus plantings (average of 13.5 ind.h-1). No statistically significant differences were found between the sampled areas (p = 0.18; α = 0.05). The main conclusion of this study is that when the landscape spatial-temporal mosaic is considered, the term “green desert” become quite limited.
Downloads
References
AGEFLOR, 2020. O setor de base florestal do Rio Grande do Sul 2020: ano base 2019. Associação Gaúcha de Empresas Florestais. 82 p. (Accessed January 3, 2023) at:. http://www.ageflor.com.br/noticias/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/O-Setor-de-Base-Florestal-no-Rio-Grande-do-Sul-2020-ano-base-2019.pdf.
Alves, T.R.; Fonseca, R.C.B.; Engel, V.R., 2012. Mamíferos de médio e grande porte e sua relação com o mosaico de hábitats na Cuesta Botucatu, Estado de São Paulo, Brasil. Iheringia, v. 102, (2), 150-158. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0073-47212012000200006.
Barlow, J.; Araujo, I.S.; Overal, W.L.; Gardner, T.A.; Mendes, F.S.; Lake, I.R.; Peres, C.A., 2008. Biodiversity and composition of fruit-feeding butterflies in tropical Eucalyptus plantations. Biodiversity and Conservation, v. 17, (5), 1089-1104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-007-9240-0.
Bencke, G.A., 2010. Diversidade e Conservação da Fauna dos Campos do Sul do Brasil. In: Pillar, V.P.; Muller, S.C.; Castilhos, Z.M.S.; Jacques, A.V.A. (Eds.), Campos Sulinos: conservação e uso sustentável da biodiversidade. Ministério do Meio Ambiente, Brasília, pp. 101-121.
Berthrong, S.T.; Piñero, G.; Jobbágy, E.G.; Jackson, R.B., 2012. Soil C and N changes with afforestation of grasslands across gradients of precipitation and plantation age. Ecological Applications, v. 22, (1), 76-86. https://doi.org/10.1890/10-2210.1.
Bettega, R.P.; Trevisan, A.C.D., 2022. Controle da germinação de Capim-anoni (Eragrostis plana VEES): inovação com bioinsumos botânicos. Research, Society and Development, v. 11, (17), e267111739142. https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v11i17.39142.
Bilenca, D.; Miñarro, F., 2004. Identificación de Áreas Valiosas de Pastizal (AVPs) en las Pampas y Campos de Argentina, Uruguay y de sur de Brasil. Fundación Vida Silvestre. Argentina, Buenos Aires. 353 pp.
Bonilla-Sánchez, Y.M.; Serio-Silva, J.C.; Pozo-Montuy, G.; Chapman, C.A., 2012. Howlers are able to survive in Eucalyptus plantations where remnant and regenerating vegetation is available. International Journal of Primatology, v. 33, (1), 233-245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10764-011-9569-9.
Brasil, 2012. Lei Federal nº 12.651/2012 (Native vegetation protection law). (Accessed December 16, 2022) at:. https://www2.camara.leg.br/legin/fed/lei/2012/lei-12651-25-maio-2012-613076-normaatualizada-pl.pdf.
Bremer, L.L.; Farley, K.A., 2010. Does plantation forestry restore biodiversity or create green deserts? A synthesis of the effects of land-use transition ns on plant species richness. Biodiversity and Conservation, v. 19, (14), 3893-3915. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-010-9936-4.
Brockerhoff, E.G.; Jactel, H.; Parrota, J.A.; Quine, C.P.; Sayer, J., 2008. Plantation forest and biodiversity: oxymoron or opportunity? Biodiversity and Conservation, v. 17, (5), 925-951. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-008-9380-x.
Bump, G.; Bump, J., 1969. A study of the spotted tinamous and the pale spotted tinamous of Argentina. US Fish and Wildlife Service Special Scientific Report – Wildlife 120, Washington, D.C. 172 pp.
Campos, B.M.; Charters, J.D.; Verdade, L.M., 2018. Diversity and distribution patterns of medium to large mammals in a silvicultural landscape in southeasten Brazil. iForest, v. 11, (6), 802-808. https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor2721-011.
Carnus, J.-M.; Parrota, J.; Brockerhoff, E.; Arbez, M.; Jactel, H.; Kremer, A.; Lamb, D.; O’Hara, K.; Walters, B., 2006. Planted Forest and Biodiversity. Journal of Forestry, v. 104, (2), 65-77. https://doi.org/10.1093/jof/104.2.65.
Carvalho, P.C.F.; Paruelo, J.; Ayala, W., 2008. La intensificación productiva en los pastizales del Río de la Plata: tendencias y consecuencias ecosistémicas. XXII Reunión del Grupo Técnico en Forrajeras del Cono Sur: Grupo Campos: 29-40.
Cordeiro, J.L.P.; Hasecack, H., 2009. Cobertura vegetal atual do Rio Grande do Sul. In: Pillar, V.P.; Muller, S.C.; Castilhos, Z.M.S.; Jacques, A.V.A. (Eds.), Campos Sulinos: conservação e uso sustentável da biodiversidade. Ministério do Meio Ambiente, Brasília, pp. 285-299.
Costella, E.; Garcia, B.A.; Costa, L.S.; Corneleo, N.S.; Schunemann, A.L.; Stefenon, V.M., 2013. Anthropogenic use of gallery in the Brazilian Pampa. Acta Scientiarum, v. 35, (2), 211-217. https://doi.org/10.4025/actascibiolsci.v35i2.13458
Cravino, A.; Brazeiro, A., 2021. Grasslands Afforestation in South America: local scale impacts of Eucalyptus plantations on uruguayan mammals. Forest Ecology and Management, v. 484, 118937. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2021.118937.
Crego, R.D.; Macri, I.N., 2009. Una técnica para la estimación de la densidade y el monitoreo de poblaciones de inambú común (Nothura maculosa) em ambientes de pastizal. Hornero, v. 24, (1), 31-35.
Farley, K.A.; Jobbágy, E.G.; Jackson, R.B., 2005. Effects of afforestation on water yield: a global synthesis with implications for policy. Global Change Biology, v. 11, (10), 1565-1576. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.01011.x.
Forest Stewardship Council (FSC), 2015. FSC Principles and Criteria for Forest Stewardship. FSC-STD-01-001 V5-2 EN. Forest Stewardship Council, A.C. 32 pp. (Accessed December 26, 2022) at:. https://my.fsc.org/my-en/forest-stewardship/fsc-principles-and-criteria-for-forest-stewardship.
Fundação Estadual de Proteção Ambiental (FEPAM), 2010. Zoneamento Ambiental da Silvicultura: estrutura, metodologia, resultados. (Accessed December 20, 2022) at:. https://fepam.rs.gov.br/zoneamento-ambiental-para-a-atividade-de-silvicultura-no-rs.
Hartley, M.J., 2002. Rationale and methods for conserving biodiversity in plantation forest. Forest Ecology and Management, v. 155, (1-3), 81-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(01)00549-7.
Hilgert-Moreira, S.B.; Fernandes, M.Z.; Marchett, C.A.; Blochtein, B., 2014. Do different landscapes influence the response of native and non-native bee species in the Eucalyptus pollen foraging, in Southern Brazil? Forest Ecology and Management, v. 313, 152-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2013.10.049.
Horák, J.; Brestovanská, T.; Mladenović, S.; Koutb, J.; Boguschc, P.; Haldac, J.P.; Zasadild, P., 2019. Green desert?: Biodiversity patterns in forest plantations. Forest Ecology and Management, v. 433, 343-348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2018.11.019.
Jackson, R.B.; Jobbágy, E.G.; Avissar, R.; Roy, S.B.; Barrett, D.J.; Cook, C.W.; Farley, K.A.; Maitre, D.C.; McCarl, B.A.; Murray, B.C., 2005. Trading Water for Carbon with Biological Carbon Sequestration. Science, v. 310, (5756), 1944-1947. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1119282.
Jobbágy, E.G.; Jackson, R.B., 2004. Groundwater use and salinization with grassland afforestation. Global Change Biology, v. 10, (8), 1299-1312. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2004.00806.x.
Kliger, M.; Ginzburg, R.G., 2022. Effectiveness of the obligation of keeping forest strips for native forest connectivity and conservation in the dry Chaco, Argentina. Forest Systems, v. 31, (3), e017. https://doi.org/10.5424/fs/2022313-18906.
Kneeshaw, D.; Leduc, A.; Drapeau, P.; Gauthier, S.; Paré, D.; Carignan, R.; Doucet, R.; Bouthillier, L.; Messier, C., 2000. Development of integrated ecological standards of sustainable forest management at an operational scale. Forest Chronicle, v. 76, (3), 481-493. https://doi.org/10.5558/tfc76481-3.
Leidinger, J.L.G.; Gossner, M.M.; Weisser, W.W.; Koch, C.; Cayllahua, Z.L.R.; Podgaiski, L.R.; Duarte, M.M.; Araujo, A.S.F.; Overbeck, G.E.; Hermann, J-M.; Kollmann, J.; Meyer, S.T., 2017. Historical and recent land use affects ecosystem functions in subtropical grasslands in Brazil. Ecosphere, v. 8, (12), e02032. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.2032.
Lindenmayer, D.B.; Hobbs, R.J., 2004. Fauna conservation in Australian plantations forests – a review. Biology and Conservation, v. 119, (2), 159-168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2003.10.028.
Lindenmayer, D.B.; Wood, J.T.; Cunningham, R.B.; Crane, M.; Macgregor, C.; Michael, D.; Montague-Drake, R., 2009. Experimental evidence of the effects of a changed matrix on conserving biodiversity within patches of native forest in an industrial plantation landscape. Landscape Ecology, v. 24, (8), 1091-1103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-008-9244-5.
Mazzolli, M., 2010. Mosaics of exotic forest plantation and native forest as habitat of Pumas. Environmental Management, v. 46, (2), 237-253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-010-9528-9.
Menegheti, J.O., 1985. Densidade de Nothura maculosa Temminck 1815 (Aves, Tinamidae): variação anual. Iheringia, v. 1, 87-100.
Menegheti, J.O.; Silva, F.; Vieira, M.I.; Bretschneider, D.; Marques, M.I.B., 1981. Spatial and temporal variations of Nothura maculosa (Temminck, 1815) from hunting data 1977, in Rio Grande do Sul state, Brazil. Iheringia, v. 58, 23-30.
Pinheiro, R.T.; Lopez, G., 1999. Abundancia del tinamú manchado (Nothura maculosa) y del tinamú alirrojo (Rhynchotus rufescens) en una área cinegética del Rio Grande do Sul (Brasil). Ornitología Neotropical, v. 10, 35-41.
Pinto, L.C.; Duarte, M.M., 2013. Occurrence (new record) of maned wolf Chrysocyon brachyurus (Illiger, 1815) (Carnivora, Canidae) in southern Brazil. Ciência Florestal, v. 23, (1), 253-259. https://doi.org/10.5902/198050988459.
Pozo, P.; Säumel, I., 2018. How to Bloom the Green Desert: Eucalyptus Plantations and Native Forests in Uruguay beyond Black and White Perspectives. Forest, v. 9, (10), 614. https://doi.org/10.3390/f9100614.
Roesch, L.F.W.; Vieira, F.C.B.; Pereira, V.A.; Schunemann, A.L.; Teixeira, I.F.; Senna, A.J.T., Stefenon, V.M., 2009. The Brazilian Pampa: a Fragile Biome. Diversity, v. 1, (2), 182-198. https://doi.org/10.3390/d1020182.
Sapucci, G.R.; Negri, R.G.; Massi, K.G.; Alcântara, E.H., 2022. Eucalyptus plantation benefits to patch size and shape of forested areas in southeast atlantic forest. Revista Árvore, v. 46, e4626. https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-908820220000026.
Silveira, L.; Jácomo, A.T.A.; Rodrigues, F.H.G.; Crawshaw, P.G., 1997. Hunting association between the aplomado falcon (Falco femoralis) and the maned wolf (Chrysocyon brachyurus) in Emas National Park, Central Brazil. The Condor, v. 99, (1), 201-202. https://doi.org/10.2307/1370238.
Thompson, J.J.; Carroll, J.P., 2006. Habitat use and survival of the spotted tinamou (Nothura maculosa) in agroecosystems in the province of Buenos Aires, Argentina. In: Cederbaum, S.B.; Faircloth, B.C.; Terhune, T.M.; Thompson, J.J.; Carroll, J.P. (eds). Gamebird 2006: Quail IV and Perdix XII. Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources. Athens, GA, USA. 111-119 pp.
Timo, T.P.C.; Lyra-Jorge, M.C.; Gheler-Costa, C.; Verdade, L.M., 2015. Effect of the plantation age on the use of Eucalyptus stands by medium to large-sized wild mammals in south-eastern Brazil. iForest, v. 8, (2), 108-113. https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor1237-008.
Viani, R.A.G.; Durigan, G.; Melo, A.C.G., 2010. A regeneração natural sob plantações florestais: desertos verdes ou redutos de biodiversidade? Ciência Florestal, v. 20, (3), 533-552. https://doi.org/10.5902/198050982067.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Brazilian Journal of Environmental Sciences (RBCIAMB)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.