Transdisciplinary Praxis in the construction of an environmental rationality
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5327/Z2176-94782690Keywords:
philosophy of praxis; transdisciplinarity; environmental epistemology; popular engineering; ontology.Abstract
What are the obstacles to sustainability? The answer largely hinges on understanding the nature of existence, the relationship between society and nature, and the focus on certain metabolic functions given by the capitalist economy. A new environmental rationality must think and act differently from the current hegemonic rationality. To this end, it will be necessary to mediate processes of dialogue and conflict among interdisciplinary, intercultural, and inter-ontological knowledge, in which different subjects need to make decisions and act in reality. This paper addresses the theoretical formulation and some results of a research project that follows three socio-environmental ventures in the three sectors of the economy to design how this Transdisciplinary Praxis would take place. Action-reflection for the construction of a Circular and Solidarity Bioeconomy.
Downloads
References
Baleeiro, A.V.F., 2025. Práxis transdisciplinar para um metabolismo social sustentável. Doctoral thesis, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia.
Baleeiro, A.V.F.; Oliveira, L.; Echeverría, A.R., 2024. Compostagem comunitária e comunicação: efetividade de Educação Ambiental crítica em conteúdos midiáticos. Revista Brasileira de Educação Ambiental, v. 19, (8), 331-343. https://doi.org/10.34024/revbea.2024.v19.16329.
Bammer, G.; O’Rourke, M.; O’Connell, D.; Neuhauser, L.; Midgley, G. et al., 2020. Expertise in research integration and implementation for tackling complex problems: when is it needed, where can it be found and how can it be strengthened? Palgrave Communications, v. 6, (1), 5. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-019-0380-0.
Bertalanffy, L., 1977. Teoria geral dos sistemas. Vozes, Petrópolis.
Bhaskar, R., 2013. A realist theory of science. Routledge, London. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203090732.
Bologna, M.; Aquino, G., 2020. Deforestation and world population sustainability: a quantitative analysis. Scientific Reports, v. 10, (1), 7631. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-63657-6.
Botkin, D.; Keller, E., 2012. Environmental science. Wiley, New York.
Bottomore, T., 1988. Dicionário do pensamento marxista. Zahar, São Paulo.
Buttigieg, P.L.; Morrison, N.; Smith, B.; Mungall, C.J.; Lewis, S.E. et al., 2013. The environment ontology: contextualising biological and biomedical entities. Journal of Biomedical Semantics, v. 4, 43. https://doi.org/10.1186/2041-1480-4-43.
Carvalho, R., 2016. Temporalidade e historicidade em Ilya Prigogine. Editora UFG, Goiânia, 168 p.
Chefe Seattle, 1854. Carta em resposta ao presidente dos Estados Unidos da América (Accessed March 17, 2026) at:. https://cetesb.sp.gov.br/carta-do-chefe-seattle/.
Clark, C., 1940. The conditions of Progress and Security. MacMillan, London.
Emmeche, C.; Kull, K., 2011. Towards a semiotic biology: Life is the action of signs. World Scientific. https://doi.org/10.1142/p771.
Engels, F., 1979. Dialética da natureza. Paz e Terra, Rio de Janeiro.
Engels, F.; Marx, K., 2010. A ideologia alemã. Boitempo, São Paulo.
Foster, J.B., 2022. A ecologia de Marx. Expressão Popular, São Paulo.
Freire, P., 2013. Extensão ou comunicação? Paz e Terra, Rio de Janeiro.
Georgescu-Roegen, N., 1971. The entropy law and the economic process. Harvard University Press.
González de Molina, M.G.; Toledo, V.M., 2023. The social metabolism: a socio-ecological theory of historical change. 2nd ed. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48411-7.
Gramsci, A., 1999. Cadernos do cárcere, v. 1. Civilização Brasileira, Rio de Janeiro, 167 p.
Grupo de Trabalho da Sociedade Civil para a Agenda 2030 (GTSC), 2023. VIII Relatório Luz da Sociedade Civil Agenda 2030 de Desenvolvimento Sustentável Brasil (Accessed on November 1, 2024) at:. www.gtagenda2023.org.br.
Guerasimov, Y.; Dreving, V.; Eriomin, E.; Kiseliov, A.; Lebedev, V.; et al., 1980. Course in Physical Chemistry. Translated from Russian by Gabriel Esteban Guerrero. Mir Publishing House, Moscow.
Hösle, V., 1996. Philosophiegeschichte und objektiver idealismus. Beck, München.
Intergovernamental Panel on Climate Changes (IPCC), 2021. Headline Statements. Sixth Assessment Report. Working Group I – Physical Science Basis. WHO, UNEP (Accessed October 12, 2021) at:. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/downloads/report/IPCC_AR6_WGI_Headline_Statements.pdf
Kondepudi, D.; Prigogine, I., 2014. Modern thermodynamics: from heat engines to dissipative structures. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
Kosik, K., 1976. Dialética do concreto (2. ed.). Paz e Terra, Rio de Janeiro.
Leff, E., 2001. Epistemologia ambiental. Cortez, São Paulo.
Leff, E., 2006. Racionalidade ambiental e reapropriação social da natureza. Civilização Brasileira, Rio de Janeiro.
Leff, E., 2024. Physis, Biopower, and Biothermodynamics: The Fire of Life. Taylor & Francis, London and New York. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781032655413.
Lenin, V.I., 1961. Conspectus of Hegel’s Science of logic (Accessed on April 8, 2025) at:. https://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1914/cons-logic/index.htm.
Liebig, J., 1865. Letters on the subject of the utilization of the metropolitan sewage, addressed to the Lord Mayor of London. Edward Stanford, London (Accessed on February 25, 2025) at:. https://www.niph.go.jp/toshokan/koten/Britain/PDF/100717910001.pdf.
Losurdo, D., 2019. O marxismo ocidental: como nasceu, como morreu, como pode renascer. Boitempo, São Paulo.
Ludwig, D., 2016. Overlapping ontologies and Indigenous knowledge. From integration to ontological self-determination. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, v. 59, 36-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2016.06.002.
Ludwig, D.; El-Hani, C.N., 2025. Transformative Transdisciplinarity: an introduction to community-based philosophy. https://doi.org/10.1093/9780197815281.001.0001.
Marques, L., 2018. Capitalismo e colapso ambiental. Editora da UNICAMP, Campinas.
Marques, L., 2025. O decênio decisivo: propostas para uma política de sobrevivência. Elefante, São Paulo.
Marx, K., 2004. Manuscritos econômico-filosóficos. Boitempo, São Paulo, 175 p.
Marx, K., 2013. O capital. Boitempo, São Paulo, v. 1, 894 p.
Marx, K., 2017. O capital: crítica da economia política. Boitempo, São Paulo, v. 3.
Marx, K.; Engels, F., 2017. Manifesto comunista. Boitempo, São Paulo.
Maturana, H.; Varela, F., 2001. A árvore do conhecimento. Palas Athena, São Paulo, v. 2.
McIrvine, E.C.; Tribus, M., 1971. Energy and information. Scientific American, v. 225, (3), 179-190.
Meadows, D.H.; Randers, J.; Meadows, D.L., 1972. The limits to growth. Universe Books, New York.
Morin, E., 2005. O método 1: a natureza da natureza. Sulina, Porto Alegre.
Nicolescu, B., 2018. O manifesto da transdisciplinaridade. Triom, São Paulo, 167 p.
Peirce, C.S., 1977. Semiótica: Perspectiva, São Paulo.
Popper, K., 2007. A pobreza do historicismo. Esfera do Caos, Lisboa.
Piaget, J., 1972. L’épistémologie des relations interdisciplinaires. In: L’interdisciplinarité: problèmes d’enseignement et de recherche dans les universités. OCDE, Paris. (Acessed March 25, 2026) at:. https://www.fondationjeanpiaget.ch/fjp/site/textes/VE/jp72_epist_relat_interdis.pdf.
Prigogine, I., 1978. Time, structure, and fluctuations. Science, v. 201, (4358), 777-785. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.201.4358.777
Reigota, M., 2009. O que é educação ambiental. Brasiliense, São Paulo.
Richardson, K.; Steffen, W.; Lucht, W.; Bendtsen, J.; Cornell, S. E. et al., 2023. Earth beyond six of nine planetary boundaries. Science Advances, v. 9, (37), eadh2458. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adh2458.
Rist, S.; Dahdouh-Guebas, F., 2006. Ethnosciences––A step towards the integration of scientific and indigenous forms of knowledge in the management of natural resources for the future. Environment, Development and Sustainability, v. 8, 467-493. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-006-9050-7.
Rodriguez, J.M.M.; Silva, E.V.D.; Cavalcanti, A.D.P.B., 2022. Geoecologia das paisagens: uma visão geossistêmica da análise ambiental. Imprensa Universitária, Fortaleza.
Ruth, M., 2013 Integrating economics, ecology and thermodynamics. Springer Science & Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1899-8.
Saito, K., 2021. O ecossocialismo de Karl Marx: capitalismo, natureza e a crítica inacabada à economia política. Boitempo, São Paulo.
Salles, D.M.; Giordani, A.C.; Biagi, A.; Paiva Affonso, I.; Fernandes, V., 2024. Social movements and the 2030 Agenda: the correlation between the progressist agendas and the Sustainable Development Goals. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Ambientais, v. 59, e2054. https://doi.org/10.5327/Z2176-947812054.
Scholz, R.W.; Steiner, G., 2015. The real type and ideal type of transdisciplinary processes: part I—theoretical foundations. Sustainability Science, v. 10, (4), 527-544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-015-0326-4.
Schrodinger, E., 1944. What is life? The physical aspect of the living cell. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Semeraro, G., 2006. Gramsci e os novos embates da filosofia da práxis. 2. ed. Idéias & Letras, São Paulo.
Thiollent, M., 2025. Metodologia da pesquisa-ação. Cortez, São Paulo.
Ulanowicz, R.E., 2001. Information theory in ecology. Computers & Chemistry, v. 25, (4), 393-399. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0097-8485(01)00073-0.
United Nations (UN), 2025. The Sustainable Development Goals Report (Accessed December 10, 2025) at:. https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2025/The-Sustainable-Development-Goals-Report-2025.pdf.
Vázquez, A.S., 2011. Filosofia da práxis. Expressão Popular, São Paulo, 440 p.
Wheeler, J.A., 1992. Toward “it from bit”. In: Quantum Coherence and Reality, World Scientific, Columbia, p. 281-300.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 André Vinícius Freire Baleeiro, Agustina Rosa Echeverría

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright over their work, granting the journal the right to its first publication.