Comparative evaluation of performance and usability of small-scale household composting with different geometric models

The evaluation of layout influence on the operational performance and usability of small-scale composters contributes to produce compact solutions with simplified operation and sanitary safety, suitable for reduced spaces and continued use. This study aims to report the influence of different designs on the composting process and the usability of compost bins. Five composters of similar scale (3 liters) and different geometric shapes were designed, manufactured, and tested. Bench tests were carried out for 60 days, and physical, chemical, and sanitary parameters were monitored, as well as the quality of the compost, according to agronomic parameters. The composters were filled with the same proportions of organic res-idues (food residues, dry leaves, and lawn trimming) to obtain the ideal C:N ratio. Three ge-ometrical layouts were tested concerning usability (hexagonal prism, cube, and parallelepi-ped) by volunteers for 50 days. The performed tests associated with the statistical treatment of results showed that the geometry of the prototypes interfered with the quality of the final compost and the composter operation. The hexagonal prism and the cube showed greater us-ability. The results represent a significant contribution to the advancement of solutions in decentralized composting.


Introduction
Minimizing and valuing domestic waste are important strategies to address the challenges of solid waste management in the cities. Several countries adopt public policies concerning organic waste, also known as food waste, which expands the discussion on issues of combating hunger and sustainability, aligned with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) 1 and 11 of the agenda approved by the United Nations for sustainable development, called "Agenda 2030" (ONU, 2015).
Organic waste is part of household waste composition and has an indirect relationship with the socioeconomic conditions of its generators. On average, the percentage of organic waste generated in developed countries (34.32%) is lower than in developing countries (61.33%) and underdeveloped countries (64.21%) (FEIL; SPILKI; SCHREIBER, 2015).
Although it has great potential, organic waste has not been prioritized for recovery due to lack of specific segregation and considerable operational costs for its treatment. Once disposed of together with common waste, it represents a significant volume to be collected and transported to landfills, reducing its useful life and increasing the operational costs of these procedures. When discarded in an environmentally inappropriate manner, it can cause environmental impacts with effects on human health due to the degradation that generates leachate (an unpleasant odor) and attracts and proliferates disease vectors (GÜNTHER, 2005). Dutra, Medeiros, and Gianelli (2019) indicate composting as an alternative to reduce negative environmental impacts resulting from the transport and final destination of organic waste. Siqueira and Assad (2015) also highlight its importance in the return of nutrients to agroecosystems. The authors point out the need for identifying and characterizing different modalities of composting municipal solid waste (MSW), as an encouragement to create new technological routes and to diversify waste management systems in municipalities.
In 2018, the destination of 62.78 million tons of MSW collected in the country registered 74.35% for proper disposal (landfills), 23.97% for inadequate disposal (controlled landfills and dumps), 1.49% for selective collection, and only 0.19% for composting. This distribution indicates the insufficiency of public policies aimed at recovering the organic portion of MSW (SNIS, 2017).
Countries concerned with sustainability in MSW management have an efficient system of waste sorting. However, the lack of organic waste segregation at source is a major problem in developing countries, considering that organics are collected as common waste and sent for final disposal with household residues through the regular municipal collection. Therefore, avoidable expenses are generated, as the organic matter could be separated at the source and sent for specific treatment (IPEA, 2018), which is the case of composting.
The National Solid Waste Policy (PNRS) is Brazil's main regulatory framework for the sector and presents composting as an alternative to the final disposal of organic waste. Waste hierarchy involves the follow-ing procedures: non-generation of waste, reduction, reuse, recycling, solid waste treatment, and environmentally appropriate final disposal of waste. Thus, composting becomes an interesting option and it is prioritized as a way of treating organic waste. In addition to promoting the recovery of organic waste and valuing it, composting is configured as an environmentally appropriate destination that avoids waste disposal in the soil (BRASIL, 2010).
The application of the composting technique is directly linked to the strategies of waste prevention, waste reduction, smart cities, and zero waste program (EUROPEAN COMMISSION, 2016). In the current environmental context, citizens play a fundamental role in minimizing waste. Individuals should decide whether or not to separate one's waste and send it to the different and specific final destinations available and focused on its recovery.
In a study carried out in the city of São Paulo, Siqueira and Assad (2015) proposed to classify composting as centralized and decentralized, with the latter subdivided into institutional, home, and community composting. Decentralized composting is still underexplored in Brazil, but presents itself as an alternative through a simplified and low-cost process (social technology).

Factors related to the practice of decentralized composting
Decentralized composting has been increasingly accepted in urban centers and can take place directly on the ground following minimum criteria or with the use of specific equipment, called compost bin or composter, that can be either homemade or manufactured (domestic/ household composting). There are several models of composters on the market, from manual to automated, with or without the incorporation of earthworms or biological accelerators. It is believed that cost, operational simplicity, compatible size, aesthetics, and geometry are determining factors in the users' choice of the model (JAYAPRAKASH; LOHIT; ABHILASH, 2018).
Experience reports provided by several authors indicate that the use of the domestic composter demands dedication and knowledge of the technique for users' effective satisfaction and for the continuity of the process.
In a study carried out by Faverial and Sierra (2014), in which composters were tested by volunteers for 84 days, 32% of the participants reported difficulties in maintaining home composting due to the presence of vectors, foul odor, leachate generation, and lack of space in homes to suitably place the equipment. Most of the volunteers impacted by these factors have chosen to discontinue the use of the composter. Similar problems related to the use of composters in domestic environments have been reported in studies carried out by Bench et al. (2005), Smith and Jasim (2009), Lléo et al. (2013), Metcalfe et al. (2012), and Margaritis et al. (2018), which reinforce the need to take users' perception into account when designing equipment for composting. According to Catecati et al. (2018), such evaluations subsidize and impact decisions about the final product and influence the users' experience. Thus, the importance RBCIAMB | v.56 | n.1 | Mar 2021 | 180-191 -ISSN 2176-9478 of linking composting to the concept of usability must be highlighted. This concept is used to define the ease with which people can employ a tool or object to perform a specific task (ISO, 1998).
To produce compact solutions suitable for environments with reduced space, it is essential to understand how the geometric model of the composter interferes with operational performance and usability. This aspect can improve the relationship between users and the equipment and enable the continuity of small-scale composting.
In this context, the purpose of this study was to optimize the physical characteristics of the composting bins for decentralized composting in residential and institutional environments considering the users' perception as a fundamental role to enhance the use of this sustainable practice.

Method
The research was developed in three methodological stages as illustrated in Figure 1. In the first stage (S1), the experimental apparatus, made of 5 composter prototypes, was developed. Then, in the second stage (S2), the developed models have been filled with residues and submitted to bench tests for 60 days to assess performance concerning sanitary aspects and the Normative Instruction of the Secretariat of Defense and Agriculture (SDA) of the Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Supply (MAPA) SDA/MAPA 25/200925/ (BRASIL, 2009). In the third stage (S3), the three models with the best performance were simultaneously filled up and operated by five users in a domestic environment for 50 days to assess the usability concept. In the end, an integrated analysis of results from stages S2 and S3 was carried out and discussion based on a bibliographic survey was performed.
The bench tests and analysis were carried out in the laboratories of the Federal Institute of Espírito Santo (Ifes) Campus Vitória, in the Research, Innovation and Development Center (CPID) of the State of Espírito Santo and in a specific laboratory specialized in the agronomic analysis.

Development of the Experimental Apparatus (S1)
As a result of the bibliographic review, handcrafted small-scale composters developed by 25 researchers were found, presenting different physical characteristics and the experimental design used in each study. Marketing research carried out in the first half of 2019 on websites of national and international manufacturers and resellers of domestic composters resulted in 42 models of different brands available and their respective physical characteristics. Tabulation and joint analysis of these results were the basis for the selection of five different geometries, used in the making of the experimental apparatus (the prototypes of the studied composters).
Prototypes were designed with a capacity of approximately 3 liters each, in order to maintain the scale with the use of the SolidWorks 2016 software version 9000 (SOLID WORKS, 2016). This capacity aimed to adequate studies on laboratory benches and facilitate the handling of prototypes. The prototypes were made with a 3-mm thick transparent acrylic and each model received nine 4-mm holes at the bottom for aeration and drain of any percolated liquid. A ruler was internally fixed to assist in the monitoring of the volume reduction of waste during the process, and a protection screen was installed at the top of the prototypes for insect protection. The experiment was carried out with five replicates for each of the five selected geometries, ending up in 25 geometric models (S2). The dimensions and layouts of the composter prototypes (experimental apparatus) are shown in Table 1 and Figure 2.

Bench test (S2)
To start the experiment, the composter prototypes were filled in batches using the same mixture of organic residues and prepared in order to obtain the ideal carbon/nitrogen ratio (C:N ratio) to start the process that, according to Kiehl (2004), is around 30:1. Proportions of residues were calculated by Equation 1, according to Massukado (2016), using the following equation for the calculation of the ideal C:N ratio (initial ratio of 30:1): (1) Q = amount of waste by type; RCN = used C:N ratio of waste.  The values of the C:N ratio used in the calculation are shown in Table 2.
The organic waste used in the experiment was collected in the restaurant of the institution that hosted the research. Dry leaves and yard trimmings were also collected in the institution. The residues were chopped, homogenized, and the used quantity and proportions are shown in Table 3. The preparation of the residues and the monitoring of the prototypes are illustrated in Figures 3 and 4, respectively.
As proposed by Arrigoni et al. (2018), the experiment was monitored three times a week with intervals of 48 to 72 hours. Sanitary aspects, such as the presence of vectors, leachate, foul odor, and mold, were monitored, as well as the internal and external temperature parameters, for which a thermo-hygrometer was used (Incoterm, model 7664, accuracy of 1% for moisture and 1ºC for temperature). A reduction in the volume of residues was also recorded during the decomposition process, and the amount of leachate was measured with the aid of a 50-mL graduated cylinder. As proposed by Guidoni et al. (2018), the resulting compost was analyzed according to the references found in the bibliographic search and the Normative Instruction 25/2009 (BRASIL, 2009) at the end of 60 days of carrying out the experiments.    The results of variables and parameters of the final organic compound were analyzed by statistical tests performed with the Statistical Data Analysis SPSS software, version 20 (IBM, 2016). The used experimental design was completely randomized, with five treatments and five repetitions (S2). Data were submitted to variance analysis and the treatment averages were compared using the Tukey's test at a 5% probability level. The parameters analyzed during S2 are shown in Table 4.
At the end of the second stage, the researchers selected the three geometric models that presented the best results according to the legal requirements for organic compost (BRASIL, 2009) and sanitary aspects observed during the monitoring.

Users' evaluation (S3)
To identify aspects that interfere in the daily and regular use of composters and consequently be able to propose improvements, five volunteers from the Ifes academic community (Campus Vitória), including students and employees, were selected and each of them received the three best performing models defined in S2. The three selected geometric models were tested in parallel by the five volunteers for 50 days, totaling 15 prototypes tested in the S3.
To determine factors related to the insertion of composting in the daily routine of ordinary people, the volunteers' selection process prioritized participants inserted in the labor market and without training in environmental subjects. The performance of this stage was approved by the Institutional Research Ethics Committee of Ifes. The profile of the selected volunteers is shown in Table 5.
Preparatory workshops were previously carried out to answer any necessary questions and provide a composting kit and guidelines re- garding the experiment to each volunteer. The delivered kit contained three geometric models of composter prototypes, monitoring sheets, standard dry organic waste (composed of earth and sawdust), water sprinkler, spoon, the base for collecting leachate, a protection net, rubber bands (against vectors), and a container for packing organic waste. The WhatsApp mobile application was used throughout this stage to support the volunteers in solving any necessary issue and providing information to researchers such as monitoring tables and photographic records. The kit delivered to each participant and the workshop are illustrated in Figure 5.

Selection of geometry based on bibliographic studies and marketing research
The results of the bibliographic studies and marketing research enabled to identify the main geometric models that were being used in the design of homemade and industrial composters (Table 6).
Geometric models with a rectangular and cylindrical base were selected for the study because they were more common in both bibliographic and marketing research. On the other hand, the hexagonal model was chosen for tests due to the notoriety obtained in the marketing research. Composters with trapezoidal and spherical geometry were also identified in the survey; however, due to budget constraints, they were not tested.
Considering that five different models would be tested, the cube (square base) and the triangular prism were added to the previously three selected models, as the former results in a more compact equipment and the latter enables the modulation of equipment (fitting more than one composting unit in parallel), making it flexible to meet different types of environments.

Bench test stage (S2)
In stage 2, the five geometric models had their performance tested and evaluated considering the final compost achieved by each model and its sanitary and operational aspects.
The initial mass of organic waste (300 g), equally added to all prototypes, was reduced due to degradation and transformation into organic compost, which resulted in the final average mass values of compost presented in Table 7.
According to the results, the P3 model (triangular prism) presented the lowest amount of final mass, reaching the highest mass reduction (84.54%), whereas the P5 model (parallelepiped) had the lowest mass reduction (78.58%). According to Onwosi et al. (2017), the reduction in mass is related to the decrease in moisture content and the decomposition of organic matter.
At the end of the bench tests (S2), samples of compost (50.0 g) obtained from each prototype model were sent to a laboratory specialized in agronomic quality tests (organic carbon, total nitrogen, and C:N ratio). The results indicated satisfactory agronomic characteristics, according to Brazilian regulations (BRASIL, 2009), for all geometric models.
Regarding the pH of the final compost, most geometric models presented a basic character (variation from 8.2 to 9.9), which behavior is similar to the one observed by Guidoni et al. (2018) and Tatàno et al. (2015), who obtained results between 8.0 to 10.0, also following the Normative Instruction SDA/MAPA 25/200925/ (BRASIL, 2009. Concerning moisture levels, all 25 prototypes produced organic compost in compliance with the Normative Instruction SDA/MAPA 25/2009 standard (maximum of 50%) (BRASIL, 2009). The initial moisture of the organic mass was 71%, but it decreased over the 60 days of the experiment, resulting in final compost values that ranged from 12% to 15%.
The electrical conductivity ranged from 0.43 to 0.71 mS/cm at 25ºC, which were lower numbers when compared with those found by Arrigoni et al. (2018) (from 2 to 5 mS/cm), Tatàno et al. (2015) (from 2 to 5 mS/cm), and Lléo et al. (2013) (1.9 ± 0.2 mS/cm at 25ºC). This difference in results can be justified due to differences in the composition of the standard waste used in the prototypes and variations in the methodologies used in the studies.
Regarding the minimum value of 15% organic carbon in the final compound required by the Normative Instruction, all geometries and prototypes complied with such regulation (31.18 to 41.18%). The obtained values were similar to the ones observed by Tatàno et al. (2015), which ranged from 28 to 38%.
The results also showed that all tested models achieved the minimum value of nitrogen established in the Normative Instruction (0.5%), with results ranging between 2.14 and 2.77%, but did not reach the same numbers of Tatàno et al. (2015), who obtained values ranging from 2 to 4%. The difference can be due to the initial composition of residues and the room temperature of each location in the studies, which were not the same.
The final C:N ratio values were within expectations, with a variation between 1/14 and 1/16 under the maximum of 1/20 established by the Normative Instruction. Tatàno et al. (2015) obtained values of C:N ratio ranging between 5/1 and 15/1, which were close to results obtained in the present research even with considerable variation. Kumar et al. (2009) considered the 10: 1 and 15: 1 range to be ideal.
The physicochemical parameters analyzed in the compost were subjected to variance analysis and the means were compared by the Tukey's test at a 5% probability level. The results are shown in Table 8.
Performance analysis of the different prototype models pointed out significant statistical differences between them regarding the parameters of conductivity, organic carbon, total nitrogen, fixed and volatile solids, and C:N ratio.   The sanitary parameters and the ease of turning the compost were also analyzed, and the results are shown in Table 9.
Turning the compost was considered difficult in the prototypes which parts of organic waste fall out during the process, and easy when performed without difficulty and loss of compost. Prototype P3 (triangular prism) was considered difficult for turning the compost due to the geometry of its base, which has reduced space available for the movement.
Sanitary aspects registered with "yes" indicate the frequent and uncomfortable presence of leachate, vectors, and foul odor, whereas aspects marked with "no" correspond to the sporadic presence or absence of them. The P1 and P3 geometric models were not approved in relation to the sanitary aspects evaluated, as they resulted in the occurrence of leachate, presence of vectors, and foul smell during the operation period.

Selection of geometric models for testing with volunteers
The process of selecting the models for users' evaluation on usability has also considered the performed marketing research (S1). Although the most common geometries found in the market were rectangular, cylindrical, and hexagonal, it was decided to replace the cylindrical model with the cube, since the cylindrical prototype presented great difficulty to be handled with and negative occurrences regarding the sanitary aspects during the monitoring process. Thus, the prototype models P2 (hexagonal prism), P4 (cube), and P5 (par-allelepiped) were chosen. They have also obtained the best results in sanitary aspects, turning process, and agronomic characteristics. The models statistically differ from each other concerning parameters of conductivity, organic carbon, and total nitrogen (Table 8).

Usability test with volunteers (S3)
According to Catecati et al. (2018), the best way to test the functionality and usability of a product, prototype, or system is by subjecting it to user testing, in which daily practice brings results to identify possible difficulties in use and operational behavior. The authors also recommend that volunteers be encouraged to propose improvements to the tested equipment.
The volunteers' perceptions regarding the tested prototypes were collected through a structured questionnaire, applied at the end of the test (after 50 days). The questions were based on studies conducted by Faverial and Sierra (2014) and Bringhenti et al. (2015). The aspects evaluated on the practice of composting and user testing with prototype models are shown in Table 10.
Two volunteers with previous experience (V3 and V4) required less time for assembling and monitoring the composters. They also registered fewer negative occurrences during the experiment. However, regardless of previous experience, all five volunteers had difficulties in adjusting the moisture level of the waste mixture.  Due to difficulties in adapting the use of prototypes in daily routines, it was observed that the employed volunteers decided to operate the composters at the weekends, which indicates an adaptive practice.
Results with volunteers in a research conducted by Faverial and Sierra (2014) indicated that 68% of the participants did not report any difficulties in the practice of composter operation in a domestic environment and that the main difficulties encountered were: presence of vectors, odor, and leachate; and difficulty in finding an adequate and safe place to implant (or store) the composter. Such findings are similar to those found in the present study.
Concerning the usability aspect, the hexagonal prism and cube models were preferred. The preference for the models was attributed to the ease of adding residues and turning the compost, in addition to the more ergonomic design presented by both of them.
Although the rectangular-based model (parallelepiped) promoted greater reduction in volume and degradability of organics, the usability was not approved by four (80%) of the five volunteers, due to the difficulty in use. Although this geometry was more frequent in the marketing research and the second most common in the bibliographic search, it was not approved by the users, which reinforc-es the importance of considering the human factor in the design of composting equipment.
The results concerning the users' evaluation of the prototype models were compared with the literature, as demonstrated in Table 11.
It is worth mentioning the lack of studies on usability for these kinds of equipment to provide a broader comparison with the obtained results, especially concerning the approaches to make the equipment used in decentralized composting more efficient and effective.

Projects adapted from domestic composters
With the aid of the SolidWorks 2016 software version 9000, and by adding the improvements proposed by the volunteers to the best rated models of composters in the research (hexagonal prism and cube), two conceptual models of composters were projected for better usability. The projected designs are shown in Figure 6.

Conclusions
It was statistically found that the geometry of the composter influenced the characteristics of the compost in terms of organic carbon parameters, total nitrogen, C:N ratio, fixed and volatile solids and, consequently, its agronomic quality.  Installation requirements -Simple and flexible installation -Mobility (portable).
-Handles and wheels for management and mobility.
Operational capacity -Appropriate dimensions to existing space. -Adequate capacity to local organic waste production and frequency of use (daily, weekly, etc.).
-Insufficient capacity to the organic waste generated Aesthetics and ergonomics -Be visually attractive and encourage use. -Contain visual instructions on how to use.
-Round edges for better accommodation and turning of waste.
Operational requirements -To provide simplified usage procedures and be accessible to different kinds of users.
-Flexibility in operation frequency.
Environmental and sanitary aspects -The design must allow internal aeration and minimize the release of odors into the environment.
-The design should facilitate cleaning and hygiene.
-It should contain vector protection barriers. -Low noise emission (equipment with an electronic system).
-Removable tray for cleaning and collecting leachate.
-Cover with screen for air circulation.
Cost -Compatible with used material and technology.
-Use of resistant and sustainable material (recycled).
*Based on Jayaprakash, Lohit and Abhilash (2018) and Metcalfe et al. (2012). The practice of composting and the daily operation by volunteers led to a preference for two geometric composter models: hexagonal prism and cube. Ergonomics, ease of use, and facility for turning composting were decisive factors in this choice. It can be seen, therefore, that geometry influenced the usability of the tested prototypes.
The improvements proposed by users contributed to the design of easier-to-use models, which may contribute to the dissemination of the small-scale composting technique and the continuity of household practice or in similar environments, which are aspects of waste minimization and sustainability.